[pmwiki-users] 2.2 Series & Blog/comments
Patrick R. Michaud
pmichaud at pobox.com
Fri Sep 22 11:19:47 CDT 2006
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:01:22AM -0500, Ben Wilson wrote:
> First, this means I should put off my own Blog/comments intent.
> First, I propose that blog features are not needed for the core. They
> are either already a part of the core (thus can be expressed best in a
> recipe) or can be added to the core without focusing on blogging
> specifically. Rather, I propose that blog recipe owners work together
> with Pm to unify the assorted recipes into a semi-official recipe.
I've already described on the list how the "officially supported"
blogging features will look and act; the major thread starts at
I highly recommend reviewing that thread before commenting about
what should or should not be included.
And to respond to a specific point being raised:
> There seems to be a trend to number the blog entries, but this is
> really an artifact of the fact that most blog software rely on RDBMSs.
PmWiki's "official" blog support won't rely on pagenames being numbered.
Any page can be a blog entry, and it can be an entry in multiple separate
More information about the pmwiki-users