[Pmwiki-users] Summary: Test of page drafts
Tue Jul 20 17:48:10 CDT 2004
Functionally everything seems to check out: 'drafts' is ready for release.
On Tuesday, 20 July 2004 9:09 PM, Christian Ridderstr?m <chr at home.se> wrote:
>On 20 Jul 2004, John Rankin wrote:
Final for now:
> ? create new page
> ?* edit draft of new page (was ?)
> * view draft page (was +)
> « go to original page from view draft page (was ?)
ie the left guillemet character
Why not » to designate a draft? Doesn't work well against a ?
Works for me. Whatever we do, I think people will need to have it explained.
On Wednesday, 21 July 2004 4:06 AM, Mirko Froehlich <mfroehlich at virage.com> wrote:
>I vote against the upside down question mark as well, but I'm not quite sure
>about the ?+ either. Does it have to be a symbol at all, or could it just be
>a D for draft? Or maybe the slightly more verbose ?(draft) or something like
>that? The (draft) could be displayed in superscript in a really small font.
>In fact, (draft) could also be used to view the draft page. If we go with
>something like this, I would suggest (org) for the original
Using words is a slippery slope. If you put 'draft' and 'original' then you
may also want to put 'delete' and turn '?' into 'create'. And I agree, icons
with tool tips are better, if they are done well.
Of course, individual administrators can customise the characters used.
And all the links have tool tips.
More information about the pmwiki-users