[pmwiki-users] Broken (:nl:) ?

[Patrick R. Michaud]

On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 07:42:11PM +0200, Oliver Betz wrote:
> In contrast, http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/PmWiki/MarkupMasterIndex
> contains a description similar to Christian Ridderström's explanation
> from the thread mentioned above:
> 
> | [[#nl]][@(:nl:)@] - Insert a newline into the ''markup'' if one is
> | not already present before or after the directive. This is
> | primarily for use together with directives  such as
> | [[([==]:include ...:) -> #include]] and is  rarely used.
> 
> If my understanding is right, shouldn't (:nl:) be removed from
> Site/EditQuickReference? I think such a special markup shouldn't be
> mentioned there, and it shouldn't be mentioned beneath \\ and [[<<]].

Correct, (:nl:) probably doesn't belong in the EditQuickReference.

Pm