[Pmwiki-users] Re: Why groups?

Patrick R. Michaud pmichaud
Mon Jun 14 09:17:23 CDT 2004


On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 04:15:27PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2004, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> 
> > Indeed.  All of the discussion has led me to the conclusion that the
> > best approach for now is to retain the one-level group structure that
> > PmWiki has always used, and provide some options for simple (possibly
> > too simplistic) extensions of groups beyond just one level.
> 
> Maybe you could hold off any decision a few more days, until I've finished
> draft of a possible link syntax based on page trees. 

Oh, it's not as if I expect to be releasing PmWiki 2.0 this week,
so there's still some time.  Nor am I wedded to sticking with a 
one-level group structure if someone can show an intuitive and workable 
multiple-level one.  I just haven't seen one yet.

Pm



More information about the pmwiki-users mailing list