[pmwiki-users] RFC: Ratings Redux
Patrick R. Michaud
pmichaud at pobox.com
Wed Sep 27 10:00:42 CDT 2006
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 10:35:23AM -0400, The Editor wrote:
> Just a few general thoughts on the rating system.
> 1) I like the five point scale. As Ben mentioned the problem is how
> many axis and which ones? It might be easy to set up several and have
> them all listed at the top of the recipe in a little table.
- not in a table, as that makes them harder to edit and maintain
- not more than two or three axes, as then it becomes too much trouble
to rate things
> I would suggest one axis be "support", which might allow us to identify
> recipes that are no longer being supported. If you ask a question of
> a recipe author, there's no or a slow answer, you give a lower rating.
I don't think we need a "rating" for this -- a simple [[!Unsupported]]
category tag will do. If someone asks a question and gets no answer
or a slow one, then just add the [[!Unsupported]] tag to the page
(ideally right next to the question that is needing an answer :-).
Then we can easily identify which recipes are "unsupported".
> The other option of course is to set up some kind of counter to log
> actual downloads.
That's a bit of a pain, because web spiders seem to like to download
the recipes also. So, we'd have to have the counter filter based
on web spiders, and we're bound to miss some, so....
More information about the pmwiki-users