[pmwiki-users] Srolling boxes

[John Rankin]

On Thursday, 8 June 2006 3:38 PM, Kathryn Andersen <kat_lists at katspace.homelinux.org> wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:31:10PM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 12:46:00PM +1000, Kathryn Andersen wrote:
>> > On second thought, having size in ems is possibly the second-best, with
>> > having the size as a percentage probably better.  Because what one
>> > *wants* is something which fits the size of their screen, yes?
>> 
>> Unfortunately, from my tests using width as a percentage doesn't
>> seem to help here -- IE expects an absolute size for the box
>> or else it just ignores it entirely.
>
>Ah, yes, I had a nagging feeling there was a problem with percentages
>for overflow...

So we are back to width in pixels as the 'least worst' option?

(Actually, I just wanted an excuse to use Dominique Faure's
cool NZ ascii map) 
> 
>-- 
> _--_|\     | Kathryn Andersen	<http://www.katspace.com>
>/      \    | 
>\_.--.*/    | GenFicCrit mailing list <http://www.katspace.com/gen_fic_crit/>
>      v     | 
>------------| Melbourne -> Victoria -> Australia -> Southern Hemisphere
>Maranatha!  |	-> Earth -> Sol -> Milky Way Galaxy -> Universe
>

-- 
JR
--
John Rankin

       \_      
        \)   
         \,\__/7
         /    /
        (   c'
         \  / 
     /,  /_/  
    |  & *   Wellington
    )  /    
   /  /,    
  /  (    
 |   /      
 \__/       
   V