[pmwiki-users] AllRecentChangesShort considered too short

michael paulukonis xraysmalevich at gmail.com
Tue Feb 25 23:34:37 CST 2014

Usually, 60 is enough.
There are times that we blow through that number -- having both of them
around covers the bases.
And allows the user to load as few changes as necessary.

Adding more breaks (anchors) into the larger list sounds great!

-Michael Paulukonis
 <http://goog_2112721603>Interference Patterns (a
@XraysMonaLisa <https://twitter.com/XraysMonaLisa>

Sent from somewhere in the Cloud
(hearthrug, by the fender)

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Petko Yotov <5ko at 5ko.fr> wrote:

> StefCT writes:
>> I like your idea. The AllRecentChanges page is a great tool for keeping
>> track of what the PmWiki community is up to, for catching the occasional
>> spammer and even - through the "Summary" field - a means of
>> communication for some users.
> Yes, this is a really great side effect. :-)
>  I also agree that AllRecentChangesShort
>> has become somewhat too short (at least for the moment).
> We can increase the number of pages in the AllRecentChangesShort page if
> this will save us time. Will 100 pages be better?
> Petko
> _______________________________________________
> pmwiki-users mailing list
> pmwiki-users at pmichaud.com
> http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pmichaud.com/pipermail/pmwiki-users/attachments/20140226/1593f4b1/attachment.html>

More information about the pmwiki-users mailing list