[pmwiki-users] conditional markup q.

[Tegan Dowling]

*Does* this work?  Now I can't seem to get it to.  Can anyone?  I'm now
suspecting that it actually is the equivalent of (:if false:), which
happened to give the same result I was going for when I tested it.

False positive, in other words.

On 4/3/06, Tegan Dowling <tmdowling at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/3/06, Allister Jenks <arj at zkarj.co.nz> wrote:
>
> > On 4/4/06, Tegan Dowling < tmdowling at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > It's even simpler than your example, if I'm reading your question
> > > correctly - it's just:
> > >
> > > (:if auth edit pagename:) or (:if ! auth edit pagename:)
> > >
> >
> >
> > Zoiks!  Just 6 days ago PM was saying he was thinking of adding that
> > syntax in response to my question about how to do exactly that.  Has he
> > already done it, or was it always there and he forgot?
> >
> > Tegan, you even replied to the thread.  Subject was "Condition on
> > authority to another page" on March 29th.
> >
>
> Huh.  No wonder I wasn't sure if/where/when I'd seen it, and couldn't find
> it in the docs.  It was only a maybe.  I'm in the middle of discovering all
> kinds of stuff that's now available since I just upgraded from 2.0.12 to
> 2.1.5 - it's hard to take it all in and be sure I'm appreciating all the
> new options that have opened up.  Conditionals are especially exciting, and
> also make me especially anxious about not continuing to resort to the same
> old work-arounds. I'm sure glad I decided to just give this a whirl.  Does
> it work on your installation, too?  Cool, isn't it?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/pmwiki-users/attachments/20060404/200d4510/attachment.html