[pmwiki-users] Conditional Directive based on time
Patrick R. Michaud
pmichaud at pobox.com
Wed Oct 12 08:01:48 CDT 2005
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 08:44:15AM -0400, Neil Herber wrote:
> At 2005-10-12 08:32 AM -0400, Miller, Joshua is rumored to have said:
> >Ah- you caught me. I thought they already existed. My suggestion
> >would be make the on or ...(before, after) more defined, like this:
>
> I am not sure that the extra tests (before vs on or before) are worth
> the effort to code or remember. If I want something on or before Dec
> 6, then I would just code it as before Dec 7.
I agree.
> Some confusion may have been caused by this line:
> > (:if date 20051206-20051210 :) display during Dec 6-9, 2005
> which should probably read:
> (:if date 20051206-20051210 :) display during Dec 6-10, 2005
Well, I'm thinking that I'd like the items below to remain somewhat
consistent:
(:if date 20051206-20051210 :)
(:if date -20051210 :)
So, if the first one includes December 10th (i.e., through 23:59:59),
then the second one should also.
I'll be very glad to code this up and add it in the distribution;
I'm just wanting some consensus on the syntax and interpretation.
Pm
More information about the pmwiki-users
mailing list