[pmwiki-users] [O-T] A & Q (Was: Fwd: Why is the pmwiki ML so heinously active?)
chr at home.se
chr at home.se
Thu Aug 4 13:03:34 CDT 2005
It's funny how Pm's response (see below) turned out to be a good example
of why you should put the answer *after* the question. I started reading
it and just plain got confused. :-)
/Christian
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> I received the following message off-list and answered it; but
> I'm curious to hear others' opinions.
>
> My opinion is that an active list is normal for a popular and
> flexible package, that we're hoping to improve the traffic by having
> better online docs, and that we're extra-busy lately as we push
> to get PMWiki out of beta status. I'm eager to hear of any
> other views, though.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Pm
>
>
> ----- Forwarded message -----
>
> Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 10:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
> To: pmichaud at pobox.com
> Subject: Why is the pmwiki ML so heinously active?
>
> I've been subscribed to the PmWiki ML for a few weeks
> now and it's the most active ML I'm subscribed to.
>
> Do you think that's a symptom of something wrong
> with the PmWiki wiki, or is it just natural for a
> popular software package to have such a busy list?
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
>
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
More information about the pmwiki-users
mailing list