[Pmwiki-users] More on attachments
John Rankin
john.rankin at affinity.co.nz
Sun Nov 24 21:08:54 CST 2002
> I propose the following for consideration: <startwikimarkup>some content%=
style<endwikimarkup>
>=20
> My thinking goes like this:
> - the text is more important than the style being applied to it, so when =
editing I don't want the style to get in the way
>=20
> - the "inverted pyramid" writing style is a pretty good convention -- =
say the most important thing first, the least important thing last
>=20
> - so could the style come *after* the text to which it refers?
Interesting idea. But I'm not sure that it works. I think most people
think of the style as occuring before the text rather than after. And
if we go towards content-based markup (as opposed to rendering-based =
markup)
then it might make more sense to have the style before the text rather =
than
afterwards.
I.e., I think that
%bookreference% The Mythical Man Month %%
makes a bit more sense than
{{The Mythical Man Month %bookreference}}
But I'd like to keep the style-after-text in mind while we're still =
struggling
to come up with something. As for me, I haven't had any great revelations
on this front over the weekend. :-(
Pm
--
maybe:
{{bookreference%The Mythical Man Month}}=20
Because if in principle (if not in practice) any markup can have a style =
attached, for example @@jrcontribution%markup is difficult to get right@@ =
or=20
!!!helptext%How to write for the web
then I think %style%content%% is inconsistent (why isn't it opening %%?). =
Or would I write:
@@%jrcontribution%markup is difficult to get right@@
in which case either the first % is redundant or it should be %%%style%=
content%%
FWIW, {{The Mythical Man Month%bookreference}} and @@markup is difficult =
to get right%jrcontribution@@ read quite naturally to me!
JR
More information about the pmwiki-users
mailing list