<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:b5001602cc984d68874c6f818af5662a@solidgone.com"
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Note that *nothing* was broken until *he* broke it.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->Again, the proposal seems to be we can minimize the effects of this by
making the documentation more consistent with itself.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Agreed. Actually the proposal was even simpler: improve the
consistency of the documentation - perhaps I shouldn't have even
mentioned WHY I cared and we would have avoided a lot of wasted
words... (it was only one short para in the middle of the whole
email...)<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:b5001602cc984d68874c6f818af5662a@solidgone.com"
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">For the record, the pmwiki.org documentation is not locked for editing.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->I think Ed W was proposing he would change it. He was seeking guidance and
input on a single consistent way to move forwards.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Thankyou for actually reading my original email - appreciated<br>
<br>
Ed W<br>
</body>
</html>