On 6/15/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Patrick R. Michaud</b> <<a href="mailto:pmichaud@pobox.com">pmichaud@pobox.com</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 05:43:12PM -0400, The Editor wrote:<br>> On 6/15/07, <a href="mailto:christian.ridderstrom@gmail.com">christian.ridderstrom@gmail.com</a><br>> > I prefer 'Site.SiteHeader'.<br>>
<br>> For what it's worth, I found AllGroupHeader counterintuitive, and<br>> would also prefer Site.SiteHeader.<br><br>Part of the advantage of AllGroupHeader is that it makes it<br>clearer that (:nogroupheader:) will suppress
Site.AllGroupHeader.<br><br>It isn't nearly as clear that (:nogroupheader:) would/should<br>suppress Site.SiteHeader.</blockquote><div><br><br>Yes, Site.SiteHeader would be confusing. In fact, when you first posted this, I thought you were adding something to or renaming the banner area, where the logo is. I would not expect a SiteHeader page's content to be automagically inserted at the top of each page, as a GroupHeader is.
<br><br>+1 for "AllGroupHeader" (both the name and the addition of it to the core)<br></div></div>