<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid20050710202546.GB30915@pmichaud.com" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 02:37:41PM -0400, DaveG wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Well, first note that `WikiWord is often an easier alternative to
writing [=WikiWord=].
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Well that I didn't know -- certainly easier to apply than [= xxx =]
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
There's also the (:nolinkwikiwords:) directive, which turns off
WikiWord links until a (:linkwikiwords:) directive is found.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">There's been discussion here about providing a directive that could
disable specific wikiwords within a page, but I haven't found a good
name for it yet.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Not sure of the meaning of directive (like %date% for example?) -- does it
need to be a word or could we simply use a double `, as in ``WikiWord. If
we need a word how about NotWiki?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Directives are markup in the form of (:something:). We could potentially
use a double `` to indicate disabling a WikiWord for the remainder of
the page, but I think some other cookbook recipes may be using `` as
a markup. Anyone know if this is true?
</pre>
</blockquote>
Why not just change the action of the `. Is it likely that existing
pages want some abbreviations to show and not others?<br>
<blockquote cite="mid20050710202546.GB30915@pmichaud.com" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Pm
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>