[pmwiki-users] RFC: Localization InterMap

[Patrik Schrey]

Hi All,

>From a maintenance point of view, I would go for the "Localization:" prefix.

But reading the other suggestions, I like the proposal from Dave to prefix 
all
PmWiki groups with Pm, and the the proposal from PM to use "L10n".
In the end the standard abbreviation for "Localization" (or "Localisation") 
is L10n,
and is better than "Local" that could be interpreted in other ways.
So combined this would be "PmL10n:".
If this proposal wins, I would like to move the group itself also to 
"PmL10n/".

Regards,
Patrik

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Petko Yotov" <5ko at 5ko.fr>
To: <pmwiki-users at pmichaud.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2010 5:19 PM
Subject: [pmwiki-users] RFC: Localization InterMap


> Hello. I'd like to read some comments about adding to a future PmWiki 
> version
> a "Localization:" prefix to the default list of intermap links, pointing 
> to
> the Localization/ group on PmWiki.org.
>
> The Localization/ group contains information and help for translators. An
> intermap prefix will make it easier to link pages in it from both the 
> default
> documentation and the language translations.
>
> There are different propositions for a prefix - the one I currently like 
> the
> most is "Localization:", even if there is a risk that an existing wiki 
> could
> have a legitimate use of such a prefix, much like the "Cookbook:" prefix,
> pointing to a different location. (The "default" intermap links are not
> overridden by [[Site.InterMap]] entries, it is slightly more complex to 
> change
> them.)
>
> If you have some comments, please reply here in the mailing list, or on 
> this
> page in the PITS : http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/PITS/01180 .
>
> Thanks,
> Petko
>
>
>