[pmwiki-users] reposting re registering, etc.

[Marguerite Floyd]

Which would mean that the only folks with edit privileges (if I
choose) would have passwords, and everyone else could write content
and put stuff in the calendar, right?

I might do this and give up on the registration of each contributor.
I'm trying to avoid as much trouble at the start as possible.

On 5/29/07, Ian MacGregor <lists at imacgregor.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday 29 May 2007 3:01:54 pm Marguerite Floyd wrote:
> > I'm reposting in case this got lost in the shuffle.  Am I asking too
> > much of pmwiki?  Or do I just not know where to look?
> >
> > Or should I just chuck it in and use one password for everyone and
> > quit worrying myself to death about it?  Then worry about spam or
> > nasty postings if/when they happen . . .
> >
> > PS: You folks are great; I'm almost starting to understand what's going on.
> > ;-)
> >
> > Here's what I posted last night:
> > "1. I would like anyone at all to read/view the site.
> >
> > 2. I would like anyone who wants to edit content, put stuff on the
> > calendar, or make a comment about content to register.  And while
> > they're registering to click a box/button saying they've read the
> > disclaimer.
> >
> > 3. I would then like a handful of people to be "editors," who have the
> > authority to clean up content if necessary, remove inaccurate stuff,
> > add important stuff.  These would be the same as, I guess, moderators.
> >  Using Authuser I can just add those folks' names and passwords.
> >
> > But how do I deal with the folks in #2?
>
> Might this help?  http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/PmWiki/AuthUser
>
> You could create an array of "editors" (folks in #3 above) so the system would
> recognise them via login.
>
> Ian MacGregor
>
> _______________________________________________
> pmwiki-users mailing list
> pmwiki-users at pmichaud.com
> http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
>


-- 
__________________
www.scritches.com
everything for the bird
__________________