[pmwiki-users] RFC: Ratings Redux
crisses at kinhost.org
Wed Sep 27 06:55:10 CDT 2006
On Sep 27, 2006, at 7:31 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
>> Third, I think an actual opinion helps.
> Textual opinions are already accounted for. Simply add a comment to
> recipe page.
1) I don't think the current cookbook encourages comments.
2) I find it most helpful if someone says 1* and explains WHY they
gave the product/module only 1 star.
> If the rating indicators are just PmWiki markup, one can even add
> comments immediately below the rating. Or whatever works best.
I think a tiny form in the page footer is most encouraging. Ease of
use. Rating: Comment:
I also think that a small descriptive link to the rating section in
the footer ("Rate this Recipe") should be in the page header :)
People can still click to edit the page and edit whatever they want.
>> Popularity may be possible in other ways.
> Another way: count the total number of ratings given - that one
> would be
> automatic and reasonably accurate.
> A third way: have something similar to Debian's popularity contest
> Installed recipes will report their activity to a central site.
> That would be a very automatic way to get at reasonably reliable
> deployment data, and help assess which recipes need most attention
> when updating PmWiki.
I prefer last activity AND a rating of the stability of the product
(pre-alpha, alpha, beta, stable/production use). The main stable
recipe should NOT be replaced with a beta, any new features added for
testing should be in a temporary fork. Recommendations for how
stable each release is can be in the release notes.
> Potential liabilities that I see:
> * Configuration-only recipes won't show up on the radar.
"theory/concept, hack, config change, sanctioned/official use" :)
The rest of the Debian's popularity concept is over my head or too
technical for a day without coffee -- and I don't drink coffee ;) I
think it's well beyond what we're looking for.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the pmwiki-users