[pmwiki-users] bibliographies revisited
john.rankin at affinity.co.nz
Tue Sep 26 23:13:38 CDT 2006
On Wednesday, 27 September 2006 2:35 PM, Crisses <crisses at kinhost.org> wrote:
>On Sep 26, 2006, at 9:58 PM, John Rankin wrote:
>> As does Vince. For avoidance of doubt: is it OK that
>> references to citations will be different from references
>> to equations, figures and tables?
>Well a bibliography reference SHOULD be different, I think.
>Otherwise you can't have a Table of Figures after your Table of
>Since that's a standard publishing feature, I would think it would
>eventually be supported even if it's not today.
Oh, the PublishPDF (Wikipublisher) service already supports
list of figures and list of tables, as well as table of
I was referring to the style of markup. REF(id), TAB(id), FIG(id),
EQ(id) are all in the same markup family. Cite:ref-id is in the
intermap markup family. Either will work; it's a question of
which family is it most at home in.
A reason not to put it in the TAB and FIG family is that lists
of figures and lists of tables come at the front while lists
of references fall at the back. OTOH, they are all lists, so
keeping it in the same family may be better.
More information about the pmwiki-users