john.rankin at affinity.co.nz
Wed Sep 13 17:15:17 CDT 2006
On Wednesday, 13 September 2006 10:01 PM, christian.ridderstrom at gmail.com wrote:
>If (:bibtex:) renders a bibliography, why not call it (:bibliography:), or
>am I missing something here? (I doubt the casual author will know what
Some possible reasons:
- we are proposing to adopt bibtex markup so there is a case for
making this explicit
- terse markup is better than verbose markup, so the markup doesn't
get in the way of the content (as long as the meaning is clear)
- what about (:references:) as an alternative?
But mostly, I haven't really thought about what markup to use yet,
and was just using (:bibtex:) as an illustration...
Would bib(liography)? be acceptable??
More information about the pmwiki-users