[pmwiki-users] preformatted text block *with* formatting? (bug in [ <at> .. <at> ] ?)
jrhett at svcolo.com
Thu May 25 18:53:50 CDT 2006
My god, talk about argumentative. You are very pleased to argue, and keep
cutting out the text of the real issue in every reply.
I wrote about one page being wrong/misleading. Pointing me to another
page might answer the original question I was looking for, BUT DOES NOT FIX
THE ORIGINAL PROBLEM REGARDING THE MISLEADING INFO ON THE PRIOR PAGE, which
I quoted in my original message!
You can argue this backwards, forwards, and sideways all you want. You
either know I'm right, or you're deliberately ignoring it to make your
point. I have a job to do, and that means Get It Done. Get It Done
requires accurate understanding of the stuff. Replies which don't address
the questions are useless.
As are these continued ad hoc attacks. PmWiki isn't getting any better
through your attacks, while I've spent all day working on it regardless.
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 04:28:08PM -0700, H. Fox wrote:
> On 5/25/06, Jo Rhett <jrhett at svcolo.com> wrote:
> >On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 03:32:22PM -0700, H. Fox wrote:
> >> Pico provided a thoughtful and helpful reply, and your reply to him
> >> was inappropriately contentious.
> >It was thoughtful for the subject, but it ignored the questions I had
> It did no such thing. Besides, whether the answer proved adequate or
> not doesn't address the fact that your reply was argumentative and in
> it you accused Pico (the first time) of doing something he didn't do.
> Prove you are right by posting the link.
> >> Provide a link to the archived copy of the message in which you quoted
> >> PmWiki.TextFormattingRules.
> Otherwise you'll prove you accused him wrongly. Twice.
SVcolo : Silicon Valley Colocation
More information about the pmwiki-users