[pmwiki-users] RFC: PITS 00701 -- WikiFarm confusion
Patrick R. Michaud
pmichaud at pobox.com
Wed Mar 15 12:50:09 CST 2006
Joachim Durcholz writes:
> However, I still have one question to ask:
> What's the advantages of fields over installing multiple wikis with
> shared code?
> (Or is it indeed just a terminological problem, and farms are already a
> shared-code thing?)
Farms are already a shared-code thing. The first sentence of
WikiFarms are a mechanism for running multiple independent
wikis on the same web server from a single PmWiki installation.
Perhaps "installation" should say "common code" or something like
that, but essentially PmWiki already does what you say it should do.
> 1) There's one directory for the "wiki engine" and one directory for the
> "wiki data".
This is how farms and fields currently work.
> 2) The data directory contains the index.php page that starts the
> machinery. index.php calls the wiki engine with any parameters required
> to make it find the data directory (ideally, the wiki engine would
> simply look at the current directory).
This is how PmWiki works now, including using the current directory
for its data directory.
> 3) The engine takes all data from the work directory, falling back to
> the engine directory whenever the work directory comes up empty. (If
> this is applied to scripts as well, this can serve to override bits and
> pieces of the engine with wiki-specific code and configuration.)
This is how PmWiki works now for the wikilib.d/ and skins/ directories.
It's *very* difficult to get PHP to apply this in scripts, since
there's not a "fall back" mechanism that we can use for include
> On a safe_mode-disabled server, this would allow webmasters to install
> the software, and nail down the configuration so that it "simply works"
> for their customers.
PmWiki already works this way. A webmaster can install a copy of
PmWiki in, say, /usr/local/pmwiki, and then customers simply
create directories with index.php files that have
The primary reason I don't make reference to /usr/local/pmwiki
in the instructions is that a great many webmasters don't have
the root privileges needed to make this happen. So then it
just reverts to "wherever PmWiki is installed", which is what
we have now.
> Being part of a web hoster, I can say that such a setup would make
> PmWiki instantly attractive for us. (Not that it isn't already - but we
> could then say things like "your WWW site comes with a preinstalled wiki
> that you can clone if you need multiple wikis", instead of "install and
> administer your own wikis". We could preinstall recipes that would make
> sense for our customers. That all would definitely make a difference.)
And yet again: PmWiki is already designed to work in *exactly*
More information about the pmwiki-users