[pmwiki-users] (:include and Attach:
eugene at boardkulture.com
Fri Aug 25 12:10:24 CDT 2006
Tegan Dowling wrote:
> That's consistent with how links work in general. That is (just to
> illustrate the point), if you had a link on Logbook/20060825 formatted
> [], it would work fine when viewed from Logbook/20060825,
> but you'd have this same problem if the link were part of the text
> that's included from Logbook/20060825 onto Main/HomePage.
I understand that but I don't (didn't) think one can treat links like
Attach: but that's just me. I am sure there are many reasons and a
design goal behind that decision.
> The work-around is the same, too: qualify the link on page 20060825.
> Instead of having [], you'd have [[Logbook/20060822]], and
> instead of having Attach:image.jpg on page 20060825, use
Thanks for the workaround it does work PLUS I didn't know one could
qualify the group in an Attach: statement ;)
Will go to bed smarter tonight (yeah!!!) doesn't happen every day ;)
Thanks a lot.
More information about the pmwiki-users