[Pmwiki-users] Why groups?
Christian Ridderström
chr
Thu Jun 10 09:00:33 CDT 2004
Hi
I still haven't had time to read (and understand) all the mails on
hiearchical groups, but since I just had a thought I want to write it down
before I forget it.
While reading some of it, I wondered why we have groups at all... why must
we say that a "group can contain subgroups". Couldn't we instead talk
about this as a page having subpages? The pages would then be organized as
a tree (or many trees). Here's an example where the tree is drawn
from left->right rather than from top->down as a tree diagrams
are usually drawn (with a comment to the right).
/
|-- Page1 - A page at the root of the tree
|
|-- Page2 - Another page at the root
|
|-- Page3
|
|-- Page4 - A page that has subpages
| |
| |-- Page5 - A subpage w/o subpages
| | |
| | `-- Page6 - A subpage with subpages
| | |
| | `-- Page7
| |
| `-- Page8 - Another subpage of Page4
|
`-- Page9
What would a 'group' correspond to here? Is that simply the parent of the
page?
Ok... I have to get back to work now, so I might simply reply to this
myself later tonight :-)
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderstr?m http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
More information about the pmwiki-users
mailing list