[Pmwiki-users] PmWiki development

[Tom Cato Amundsen]

On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 04:36:48PM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> Recently I've been working on a number of features that I and others
> have wanted to add to PmWiki, and over the past few weeks I've basically
> come to the conclusion that perhaps it's time for a redesign/rewrite
> of the core code.  To that end, I've been developing a new version

Good. At some point it often is necessary.

>   - Source code is maintained on sourceforge, available via anonymous CVS,
>     and will be easier to document and explain
> 

This is nice. It will speed up things. Even if you don't give write
access to many, people can test earlier and report bugs before you make
releases.

> This brings up the question of "what to call the new version?"  Thus
> far I've come up with only a few ideas:
> 1.  Release the existing 0.6 version (with a couple more enhancements)
>     as "PmWiki 1.0", with the new version to be called "PmWiki 2.0".
>     This is reasonable, as I think 0.6 has reached a level of 
>     maturity where it could justifiably be labeled as a 1.0 release.
> 2.  Leave the existing 0.6 version as is, and designate the new 
>     version as "PmWiki 1.0" when it is officially released, perhaps 
>     being called "PmWiki 0.9" while it's continuing to be developed.
> 3.  Rename the new version to something other than "PmWiki".
> 
> Of the above, I think I prefer #2, but I'm interested in hearing what
> makes sense to others.  
> 

Personally I don't care if you choose #1 or #2. But I hope you don't
select #3.

Tom Cato

> Pm
> 
> -- 
> Pmwiki-users mailing list
> Pmwiki-users at pmichaud.com
> http://pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users_pmichaud.com
>