[Pmwiki-users] the descriptions of emphasis
Thu Dec 2 15:57:09 CST 2004
On Friday, 3 December 2004 11:19 AM, Neil Herber <nospam at mail.eton.ca> wrote:
>My initial suggestion for changing the markup was based solely on the
>disconnect I saw on the Quick Reference Guides that were recently discussed
>and displayed. On both of the examples (admittedly in an effort to reduce
>the screen real-estate), the word "italics" was used as an example of the
>result of the emphasis markup. Simply changing the word to "emphasis" would
>remove the disconnect between the description and the generated tags. I
>hope it would also warm the cockles of John's heart, since he is a
>self-described "standards bigot". ;-) Note that the markup documentation
>on PmWiki uses the words emphasis and strong with parenthetical remarks as
>to rendering, as in the last line of next quoted section.
Totally agree. Is this better?
'Strong' doesn't seem right somehow...
More information about the pmwiki-users