[Pmwiki-users] the descriptions of emphasis

[John Rankin]

On Friday, 3 December 2004 11:19 AM, Neil Herber <nospam at mail.eton.ca> wrote:
>My initial suggestion for changing the markup was based solely on the 
>disconnect I saw on the Quick Reference Guides that were recently discussed 
>and displayed. On both of the examples (admittedly in an effort to reduce 
>the screen real-estate), the word "italics" was used as an example of the 
>result of the emphasis markup. Simply changing the word to "emphasis" would 
>remove the disconnect between the description and the generated tags. I 
>hope it would also warm the cockles of John's heart, since he is a 
>self-described "standards bigot".  ;-)  Note that the markup documentation 
>on PmWiki uses the words emphasis and strong with parenthetical remarks as 
>to rendering, as in the last line of next quoted section.
>
Totally agree. Is this better?
http://intranet.affinity.co.nz/pmwiki2/index.php/Main/MarkupQuickReference

'Strong' doesn't seem right somehow...
-- 
JR
--
John Rankin