[Pmwiki-users] the descriptions of emphasis
Neil Herber
nospam
Thu Dec 2 06:31:29 CST 2004
PmWiki principle number 1 is "Favor writers over readers", and it goes on
to note that burdening writers with the minutia of HTML is undesirable.
With that principle in mind, I would suggest that the three modes of text
emphasis should be renamed, and the HTML that PmWiki emits should be
changed. Anybody who has used a word processor knows about italics and
bold, but the concept of "emphasis" is almost pure HTML.
As far as I can tell, these changes should have absolutely no effect on any
user *unless* their browser settings or style sheets render the emphasis
modes differently.
Doubled single-quotes ('') usually render as italics but emit <em></em> tags
Call this mode "italics" and emit <i></i>
Tripled single-quotes (''') usually render as bold but emit
<strong></strong> tags
Call this mode "bold" and emit <b></b>
Five single-quotes (''''') usually render as bold italics but emit
<strong><em></em></strong> tags
Call this mode "bold italics" and emit <b><i></i></b>
These thoughts came to me when I noticed that the descriptions of these
modes in the various Quick Reference proposals used the bold and italic
nomenclature even though the HTML did not use <b> and <i> tags. The
descriptions in the current PmWiki documentation are dead accurate. For
example:
>Use doubled single-quotes (''), i.e., two apostrophes, for emphasis
>(usually italics)
Neil
Neil Herber
Corporate info at http://www.eton.ca/
Eton Systems, 15 Pinepoint Drive, Nepean, ON, Canada K2H 6B1
Tel: (613) 829-4668
More information about the pmwiki-users
mailing list