Its hard to argue with that, although I wasn't aware of it.<div><br></div><div>I do think that the idea of having a separate wiki (farm) is perhaps more appropriate.</div><div><br></div><div>I do not think that is acceptable to have pages that are locked for read.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Simon</div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 20 August 2010 02:53, Patrick R. Michaud <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pmichaud@pobox.com">pmichaud@pobox.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="h5">On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:32:03PM +0200, Peter Bowers wrote:<br>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Eemeli Aro <<a href="mailto:eemeli@gmail.com">eemeli@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> > This has been bothering me as well. Pm, Petko, could you comment?<br>
><br>
> +1<br>
<br>
</div></div>As a general rule I've always allowed people to set up custom<br>
personal groups on <a href="http://pmwiki.org" target="_blank">pmwiki.org</a> -- this is just an example of that.<br>
<br>
If we need to change that policy, we can discuss it. One option<br>
might be to set up a separate wiki to hold personal pages...<br>
but that involved maintaining a separate wiki. :-(<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Pm</font></blockquote></div>
</div>